Tim Golden

Tim Golden

Principal, WellGoverned.ai

I have spent nearly 30 years in legal technology — building analytics and AI systems, running enterprise architecture and IT governance, and working directly with clients on how data changes the way legal services are delivered.

I bring that operating experience, governance judgment, and hands-on technical delivery to law firms of all sizes, corporate legal departments, and other organizations — helping you choose worthwhile AI uses and put them into practice responsibly.

Direct client consulting

In my final year at a global Am Law 100 firm, I worked directly with clients as a consultant through the firm's legal service-delivery innovation program, applying data and technology to legal-service delivery and business problems.

That work included developing a matter-pricing engine that produced data-driven menus of legal services, reconciling hundreds of client-required and firm-created task lists into a standardized set, and building text-mining that mapped historical time entries into those categories so pricing could draw on actual delivery history. I was the only non-attorney on the seven-person team.

It was not the beginning of my client-facing work — I did billable technology consulting for firm clients between 1997 and 2000 — but it was where I learned how a consulting relationship differs from an internal one.

Enterprise governance and data leadership

Before AI, I spent a decade on the unglamorous half of this work: IT governance, enterprise architecture, executive reporting, and security responsibilities including vulnerability management and third-party audits. Master data management and independent data validation came later, alongside the AI work.

I created a global Am Law 100 firm's first formal IT governance team and a national one's first Project Management Office. Both were cases of building an organizational capability that did not previously exist — which is considerably harder than advising one that does, and is most of what AI governance actually asks of a company right now.

At a global Am Law 50 firm I held responsibilities associated with a $44 million global IT budget; at a global Am Law 100 firm I managed a worldwide IT budget of nearly $40 million. I mention it because governance decisions that ignore cost and capacity do not survive contact with a budget cycle.

Hands-on AI delivery

I have been running enterprise LLM infrastructure since late 2022, starting when GPT-3.5 was released. That has meant launching and leading a firm's generative AI program from inception, architecting centralized model access, building custom applications and knowledge workflows, leading enterprise platform rollouts with identity and access governance across multiple regions, integrating AI with the systems people already use, and building the adoption reporting that told leadership what was actually happening.

I care a great deal about whether what I build can be handed over. I have written close to a hundred internal software packages so that work could be reused rather than rebuilt, and produced technical specifications complete enough for a separate team to reimplement a system in a different language. That instinct — that delivery is not finished until someone else can run it — is the same instinct behind good governance.

Examples of work

Client names are withheld.

Governed enterprise AI access

Situation. A global law firm needed its people to use generative AI without routing confidential client material through uncontrolled consumer services.

My contribution. I built and operated centralized model access, led the rollout of enterprise AI platforms, established identity and access controls including provisioning and access policy, integrated the tools with firm systems, and built adoption reporting segmented by department and role.

Result. Staff worked through governed, supported access paths across multiple regions, and leadership had evidence of where AI was being used to inform further investment.

Trusted data at scale

Situation. A firm-wide document management migration was underway, and the vendor's validation processes were not sufficient to confirm the results.

My contribution. I took on validation mid-engagement, after determining the existing process was inadequate, and built an independent framework from scratch that checked document records and access-control entries against their sources.

Result. The migration could be verified independently rather than accepted on assurance. It covered roughly 135 million documents and 500 million access-control records across more than 25 source libraries.

Data behind legal-service delivery

Situation. A firm wanted to price and deliver legal services from evidence rather than precedent and instinct.

My contribution. Working directly with clients through the firm's legal service-delivery innovation program, I developed a matter-pricing engine, standardized the firm's task lists, and built text mining that mapped historical time entries into those categories.

Result. Pricing and scoping conversations could draw on the firm's own delivery history rather than estimates.

Governance roadmap from evidence

Situation. A business was expanding its use of AI across employee tools, a customer-facing product, and AI-assisted software development, without an agreed view of who owned which decisions.

My contribution. I ran the assessment myself: working sessions with the leadership team, a documented evidence review, a current-state profile, a prioritized governance roadmap with a companion inventory of applicable regulation, and proposed work plans for the phases that could follow.

Result. The first phase delivered a current-state profile, a governance roadmap, a regulatory inventory, an executive readout, and scoped work plans for what comes next. Further phases are separately authorized at an executive decision gate rather than assumed.

Career

2017–2026
Director, Data Science Analytics
Global Am Law 50 firm
2016–2017
Manager, Data Analytics
Global Am Law 100 firm
2007–2016
Manager, Enterprise Architecture and IT Governance
Global Am Law 100 firm
2006–2007
IT Project Manager
National Am Law 100 firm
1997–2006
Systems assurance, desktop architecture, and project engineering
Global Am Law 100 firm

Professional service

International Legal Technology Association:

  • Conference Committee, 2014–2018
  • LegalSEC Steering Committee, 2012–2014
  • Professional Services Peer Group, 2011–2014
  • City Representative, 2003–2010
  • Responsibility for ILTACON Data Science Track sessions

Speaking engagements and publications on LinkedIn

How I work

I lead every engagement personally. When the agreed work calls for specialists I bring them in, but you are not being handed to a team you have not met.

Start a conversation